McCravy

County Bank

Home | Facebook | Twitter
GwdToday | Greenwood, SC
News
• Greenwood
• Lakelands & beyond
• School
• Sports
• Church News
What's Happening
• Events
• Birthdays
• Cool Pics
GwdMarket
• Promotions
• Classifieds
• Employment
• Yard Sales
• Add Product/Service
• Add Classifieds

Sheriff Tony Davis 2016
Crime Network
• Arrest Reports
• SC Sex Offenders
Obituaries
• Obituaries
• Notices
2016 Elections
• Election Overview
• Political News & Events

Mr John Pizza
Mosquito Authority
Kirks Pool
YMCA Banner


home : news : greenwood May 25, 2016

Carolina Health

Ninety Six Piggly Wiggly



Carolina Liquidators HP Top News



2/6/2013 1:14:00 PM
Dam projects still on hold

Brian King
Staff Writer


The projects for which $30 million was raised via a special penny sales tax are still on hold while Greenwood County staff attempt to persuade the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to reduce standards they imposed on the county.

Residents of Greenwood County approved a capital project tax in 2006 that allowed the county to raise $40 million - $10 million for the new library and $30 million for two projects at Buzzards Roost Dam. The tax was stopped last June after the county reached the $40 million mark.

One of the two dam projects mandated by FERC was a seismic upgrade to the earthen dam. The county hired an expert to fight the mandate, arguing that the upgrades mandated were more appropriate for an area more likely to have a major earthquake. FERC agreed with the expert’s assessment and removed the mandate last June. The cost to hire the expert was about $500,000, according to county engineer Larry Smith. The expense saved taxpayers roughly $15 million.

Last August, the county, with unanimous council approval, hired a consulting firm to dispute requirements of the other FERC mandated project at a cost of about $144,000. That project would require upgrades to the fuse plug at the dam that would allow it to withstand the maximum probable flood for a period exceeding 10,000 years. Smith said that the requirements are based on past data and a lot of computer modeling.

Smith said that, even though he is a certified civil engineer, FERC will only accept proposals from nationally recognized engineers and experts in that particular field of study. Smith also said that a number of counties on the east coast have been able to successfully reduce their probable maximum flood by hiring consultants.

Greenwood County hired HDR, Inc., a global consulting firm known for their work at Hoover Dam, to assist in refuting what Smith called “the science behind the mandates.” HDR is currently putting together the final report on the site specific probable maximum precipitation (SSPMP), which will be submitted to FERC by the end of February. The SSPMP data will then be used to determine the probable maximum flood and submitted in a final report to FERC in May. Should FERC agree with the consultants, taxpayers could save another significant amount of money.

As for the money saved by reducing the requirements of the FERC mandates, county manager Toby Chappell said that the decision would rest with council. Chappell said he felt the most viable option would be to use the money to pay down some of the county’s debt.

Smith told council in August that he hoped there would be a resolution before the end of the fiscal year on June 30, but noted that the involvement of FERC could delay things considerably.



Carolina Liquidators In Article
Related Stories:
• Baggett to continue as county attorney
• County attorney position to come to a vote
• Council opens up Veteran's Center to Lander ROTC



Reader Comments

Posted: Friday, February 8, 2013
Article comment by: david stevens

just like the government asking for more and more money every year! wonder where it goes? could it be going to the free cell phones being giving away in Greenwood? only lawmakers would know!


Posted: Friday, February 8, 2013
Article comment by: Brandon N

I think the Greenwood citizens should be more involved in where this money goes. Remember all those incidents with the council misusing money?

Posted: Friday, February 8, 2013
Article comment by: Hans Gruber

So the county passed a bill on the premise of repairing these projects, then raised the $30 million for the dam upgrades, but knew they were going to fight the upgrades in court. Now they sit on a massive pile of cash. How convenient. But sooo not surprising.

Posted: Friday, February 8, 2013
Article comment by: Mrs Dropps

I agree with Dianne Tucker . She is right on the money . What happened to the grant money that they received for this project ?

Posted: Thursday, February 7, 2013
Article comment by: Dianne C Tucker

'Dam upgrade Project' Monies collected, minus expenses and yet to be determined conclusive findings of total monies saved via determining studies and regulation changes due to said findings, are necessary for things like this..however, Total monies collected = the factoring cost should be the only monies spent until the project is complete that the Fund was taxed and set aside for..If they allow the projected 'savings' to be spread before the initial Dam project is complete, the needed money to meet the final cost will be gone, especially when you consider the rising cost of everything, which changes every hour that we wait for approval..I would certainly vote against any of the money being spent on other things until the initial Dam Project Upgrades are complete.



Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search
















Greenwood Living
Home | Facebook | Twitter
GwdToday.com • 720 Montague Ave Suite 314 • Greenwood • SC • 29649 • News@GwdToday.com
Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved